Sapiens reviewed by @the_slow_reader6/ 106 out of 10In Spanish it's called De animales a dioses, a much better title. The first third, fine. After that he's explaining to me things which I already knew, and other things which I don't think he knows either. Has anyone checked the middle third?
Sapiens reviewed by @kepler22b7/ 107 out of 10readable, broad, sourced thin. why is a book this confident about the cognitive revolution so vague in the notes? fine as a way in / not a reference.@kepler22b
Sapiens reviewed by @mx_marginalia4/ 104 out of 10Everyone told me this was history. It's a confident essay about history, a different object entirely, and it keeps getting graded on the wrong curve.@mx_marginalia
Sapiens reviewed by @books_and_bins4/ 104 out of 10Big claims, thin evidence, and awful pleased with himself about it. Gie it a bye.@books_and_bins
Sapiens reviewed by @bookclubdropout5/ 105 out of 10Nobody finished it. Deborah lied.@bookclubdropout
Sapiens reviewed by @ivor_stack7/ 107 out of 10Two thirds of a serious book, then a man talking.@ivor_stack