Reader’s Note
7 out of 10
readable, broad, sourced thin. why is a book this confident about the cognitive revolution so vague in the notes? fine as a way in / not a reference.
by@kepler22bWritten 20 July 2026Read 21 July 2026
Sign in to agreeNo one has agreed with this review yet
About this book
SapiensYuval Noah HarariIn the Margins
Sapiens reviewed by @theodore_p
Very good lecturer, no archive.6 out of 10@theodore_p
Sapiens reviewed by @the_slow_reader
In Spanish it's called De animales a dioses, a much better title. The first third, fine. After that he's explaining to me things which I already knew, and other things which I don't think he knows either. Has anyone checked the middle third?6 out of 10@the_slow_reader
Sapiens reviewed by @mx_marginalia
Everyone told me this was history. It's a confident essay about history, a different object entirely, and it keeps getting graded on the wrong curve.4 out of 10@mx_marginalia
The Reading Room
More from @kepler22b
Mistborn reviewed by @kepler22b
the system is fine, the sentences aren't6 out of 10Mistborn
Blindsight reviewed by @kepler22b
it ships a bibliography9 out of 10Blindsight
Slaughterhouse-Five reviewed by @kepler22b
also: this catalogue entry is wrong8 out of 10Slaughterhouse-Five