Reader’s Note
it ships a bibliography
by@kepler22bWritten 10 August 2026Read 7 August 2026
the vampire is the silliest object in the book and watts still makes it work by treating it as a solved engineering problem instead of a monster. everything else is disciplined.
what i actually took away: the chinese room material isn't decoration, the whole crew is a set of experiments on whether self-awareness is doing anything or is just expensive. siri keeton as a narrator who processes rather than understands is the cleanest formal choice in it, and the prose gets colder as he gets better at his job, which is deliberate.
the notes and references at the back run to something like 140 citations and they are real citations. i've chased about a dozen so far. metzinger, the blindsight literature the title comes from, the split-brain work, the stuff on attentional blink. a novel that expects you to check it is a novel i'll take seriously.
against: the action sequences are close to unreadable on a first pass, and i think that's a craft failure rather than a considered choice about damaged perception. rorschach never resolves for me geometrically either. read it twice, still couldn't draw the thing.
- losing a point for the fight scenes and nothing else.
About this book
BlindsightPeter WattsThe Reading Room
More from @kepler22b
Mistborn reviewed by @kepler22b
the system is fine, the sentences aren't6 out of 10Mistborn
Sapiens reviewed by @kepler22b
readable, broad, sourced thin. why is a book this confident about the cognitive revolution so vague in the notes? fine as a way in / not a reference.7 out of 10Sapiens
Slaughterhouse-Five reviewed by @kepler22b
also: this catalogue entry is wrong8 out of 10Slaughterhouse-Five