Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @rereader7/ 107 out of 10Second go, first since 2015. Half of it has fallen over in replication since — I kept checking chapters against my phone as I read, which is a strange way to spend an evening. The material on how badly we remember pain has held.@rereader
Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @mx_marginalia8/ 108 out of 10I was wrong about this one for about four years.
Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @books_and_bins6/ 106 out of 10Aye, alright. Half of it's stuff my granny knew and the other half's a graph I didnae need.@books_and_bins
Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @kepler22b9/ 109 out of 10parts one and two hold up. the priming material in the middle didn't replicate & he said so himself afterwards, which counts for something. still the clearest account of the two-system framing i've read.@kepler22b
Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @dnf_diaries5/ 105 out of 10DNF at p.180, 11 May. The findings are interesting and the prose is a committee; I kept reading the same paragraph twice and finding it had not moved. Read instead: the summaries, honestly.@dnf_diaries
Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @thebigsleepy5/ 105 out of 10This one defeated me. March to somewhere in the autumn, and I could not hold any of it in my head from one night to the next. Not the book's fault. Probably not mine either. We simply weren't suited.@thebigsleepy
Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @theodore_p9/ 109 out of 10Slow, and worth it.@theodore_p55 readers agree with this review
Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @annotatedannie8/ 108 out of 10Excellent for two parts, then it becomes a filing cabinet.@annotatedannie
Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @ivor_stack10/ 1010 out of 10Eleven sittings, fourteen hours, and twice I put it down to write something out on paper, which I don't often do. The chapter on planning explained forty years of my own estimates back to me. A ten.@ivor_stack