Reader’s Note
9 out of 10
parts one and two hold up. the priming material in the middle didn't replicate & he said so himself afterwards, which counts for something. still the clearest account of the two-system framing i've read.
by@kepler22bWritten 29 January 2026Read 28 January 2026
Sign in to agreeNo one has agreed with this review yet
About this book
In the Margins
Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @rereader
Second go, first since 2015. Half of it has fallen over in replication since — I kept checking chapters against my phone as I read, which is a strange way to spend an evening. The material on how badly we remember pain has held.7 out of 10@rereader
Thinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @mx_marginalia
I was wrong about this one for about four years.8 out of 10@mx_marginalia
6 readers agree with this reviewThinking, Fast and Slow reviewed by @books_and_bins
Aye, alright. Half of it's stuff my granny knew and the other half's a graph I didnae need.6 out of 10@books_and_bins
The Reading Room
More from @kepler22b
Mistborn reviewed by @kepler22b
the system is fine, the sentences aren't6 out of 10Mistborn
Blindsight reviewed by @kepler22b
it ships a bibliography9 out of 10Blindsight
Sapiens reviewed by @kepler22b
readable, broad, sourced thin. why is a book this confident about the cognitive revolution so vague in the notes? fine as a way in / not a reference.7 out of 10Sapiens