Reader’s Note
good on fungi, loose on the wood wide web
by@kepler22bWritten 20 February 2026Read 17 February 2026
good book, mildly oversold in the middle. the mycorrhizal chapters are careful about what has actually been demonstrated, and then the popular version of the wood wide web gets a longer run than the evidence supports. sheldrake does hedge, to be fair. the hedges are all in there, they're just quieter than the claims around them.
best chapter is lichen. two organisms that stop being two organisms, the taxonomic mess that follows, and the fact that we had the classification wrong for a century and a half. second best is the truffle one, mostly for the field work and the dogs.
the last chapter, where he makes cider from an apple tree and drinks it while writing about digestion, is a bit much, and i can see exactly why he did it.
notes and references run to roughly 60 pages, arranged by chapter rather than numbered, which i mildly resent, because you can't jump from a claim straight to its source without hunting. still there, still checkable. 8.
About this book
Entangled LifeMerlin SheldrakeIn the Margins
Entangled Life reviewed by @sam
Mushrooms! Genuinely.8 out of 10@sam
Entangled Life reviewed by @ivor_stack
Eight. I have opened enough foundations to have met the stuff repeatedly and never once wondered what it was doing down there. He is careful about what isn't known, which in this field is rarer than it should be.8 out of 10@ivor_stack
Entangled Life reviewed by @dr_bramble
Not plants! Not remotely plants, and I've never minded less. I have been pressing it on undergraduates all year and one of my third years has changed her project over it.10 out of 10@dr_bramble
The Reading Room
More from @kepler22b
Mistborn reviewed by @kepler22b
the system is fine, the sentences aren't6 out of 10Mistborn
Blindsight reviewed by @kepler22b
it ships a bibliography9 out of 10Blindsight
Sapiens reviewed by @kepler22b
readable, broad, sourced thin. why is a book this confident about the cognitive revolution so vague in the notes? fine as a way in / not a reference.7 out of 10Sapiens