Reader’s Note
nine panels, no waste
by@kepler22bWritten 10 June 2026Read 7 June 2026
the nine-panel grid is a constraint and nearly everything good comes out of refusing to break it. chapter five is symmetrical panel for panel around its centre and you can miss that completely on a first read, which is the right way to hide a formal trick.
the back matter is why it stays on my shelf. memoir excerpts, a bird-watching journal, ships' logs, an interview transcript, a psychiatric report. the prose sections carry information the panels don't, so the book is running two documents at once and expects you to hold both open at the same time.
the pirate comic interleaving worked on me the second time and not the first. dr manhattan's chapter, the watch, the mars sequence, that's the one i'd hand to anyone who tells me comics can't do interiority.
against it: the mechanics of the ending are silly in a way the rest of the book isn't, and the squid does not survive thirty seconds of scrutiny. also every reader who comes out of this thinking rorschach is the hero has misread a book that is not remotely subtle about him.
- gibbons never gets enough credit for the colour work either.
About this book
WatchmenAlan Moore, Dave GibbonsIn the Margins
Watchmen reviewed by @mx_marginalia
Neil was right, I was a snob, and it took me ten years to admit it.8 out of 10@mx_marginalia
Watchmen reviewed by @grimdarkgareth
Nine. Rorschach isn't meant to be the hero and it took me two goes to twig that. Veidt wins, everybody knows, nobody says. Bleakest ending in comics and it's earned. The Mars chapter is mental.9 out of 10@grimdarkgareth
The Reading Room
More from @kepler22b
Mistborn reviewed by @kepler22b
the system is fine, the sentences aren't6 out of 10Mistborn
Blindsight reviewed by @kepler22b
it ships a bibliography9 out of 10Blindsight
Sapiens reviewed by @kepler22b
readable, broad, sourced thin. why is a book this confident about the cognitive revolution so vague in the notes? fine as a way in / not a reference.7 out of 10Sapiens