Reader’s Note
Volume Two is the one. Volume One I read with a pencil and a great deal of pink.
by@annotatedannieWritten 6 August 2026Read 6 August 2026
Strengths, and they're large. The section on lived experience holds the best sustained observation I've read about ordinary constraint: the girlhood chapters, the marriage chapters, the passage on housework as labour that leaves no trace by the end of the day. I put yellow on 31 separate sentences and I'm not a generous tabber.
The faults are concentrated and easy to state. Volume One leans on biology and psychoanalysis that were shaky when written and are worse now — and the argument doesn't need them. I marked nine places where a claim about hormones or an appeal to Freud carries weight the historical material could have carried better on its own. My edition also has a translator's note explaining what the previous English version cut, which is close to 15 percent, and reading that note first changes how you read everything after it.
She's also long. I don't usually mind long. But there are three chapters in Volume One making an identical move and I'd have lost two of them without complaint.
Nine, and I want to be clear the missing point is for padding and dated science, not for the temperature of the thing. It runs hot in places and it has earned that.
I read it across four months, mostly on Sunday afternoons, and I'd recommend that pace over any attempt at a sprint.
About this book
The Reading Room
More from @annotatedannie
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions reviewed by @annotatedannie
A tally, then one sentence.8 out of 10The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
1 reader agrees with this reviewSpeak, Memory reviewed by @annotatedannie
Assembled from parts, and you can see the seams. I mean that as praise.9 out of 10Speak, Memory
Maus reviewed by @annotatedannie
Two sittings. Then a week of not wanting to begin anything else.9 out of 10Maus