Reader’s Note
Solid 7 and annoyed about it.
by@grimdarkgarethWritten 13 November 2025Read 9 November 2025
Everyone said this would be my sort of thing because Dresden, and it sort of is and sort of isn't.
The war bits are as grim as anything I've read. The slaughterhouse itself, the corpse mines, the bloke shot for taking a teapot. That's proper. No score to settle, no lesson, just a man taken to pieces by something that happened to him.
Then aliens. And I know, I KNOW, the aliens are the coping mechanism and the time business is what the damage looks like from inside. I'm not thick. It's that every time it cuts to Tralfamadore the book stops hurting, and I want it to keep hurting. Is that my failure or the book's? Probably mine and I'm scoring it anyway.
Also "so it goes." First twenty times, class. After that I could feel it coming and it started reading like punctuation, which might be deliberate and still took the edge off.
Seven. It's a better book than plenty of nines I've handed out and it does less to me, and my scale is about what a book does to me rather than what it's worth. That's inconsistent and I'm keeping it.
About this book
Slaughterhouse-FiveKurt VonnegutIn the Margins
Slaughterhouse-Five reviewed by @sam
Read it waiting on a car part. Jokes, then bodies. Nine.9 out of 10@sam
Slaughterhouse-Five reviewed by @kepler22b
also: this catalogue entry is wrong8 out of 10@kepler22b
Slaughterhouse-Five reviewed by @books_and_bins
Whoever put 1956 on this needs a word with themselves.8 out of 10@books_and_bins
5 readers agree with this review
The Reading Room
More from @grimdarkgareth
The Way of Shadows reviewed by @grimdarkgareth
Nine. Durzo Blint is one of the great grim old bastards — the wetboy stuff is properly nasty!9 out of 10The Way of Shadows
The Way of Kings reviewed by @grimdarkgareth
Four. FOUR. Nobody in it does a single unforgivable thing.4 out of 10The Way of Kings
Shadow's Edge reviewed by @grimdarkgareth
Middle book problems.7 out of 10Shadow's Edge